Templates, vocabulary, and risk structure built for psychiatrists, PMHNPs, and therapists. Not adapted from medicine.
A general AI scribe writes SOAP shaped for primary care. A psychiatric follow-up is not shaped like that. Neither is a therapy session. Every note becomes a reshape job.
Med management, psychiatric intake, psychotherapy, Spravato, TMS, ASAM, crisis, group, screener. Each visit type has its own template, its own CPT codes, and its own audit rules. Click any row.
Format choice on a per-clinician basis: SOAP, BIRP, or DAP.
What a general AI scribe produces. What a BH-specific scribe produces for the same patient. The difference is not opinion. It is what the payer expects to see.
A scribe trained on primary care does not know what akathisia sounds like in a conversation. It does not know that PHQ-9 score deltas belong in the note. It does not know how to structure a risk-of-self-harm assessment that holds up to chart review.
Numeric scores enter the note in the shape payers expect. Score deltas across sessions are tracked. 96127 is billable up to four measures per visit.
The model recognizes interventions by name and writes them into the note in modality-correct language. No "client appears to have engaged in coping strategies." A name is named.
SOAP, BIRP, or DAP. Choose once, the note arrives in that shape every visit. Switching formats does not require rebuilding the template.
A general scribe mishears or omits these. JotPsych writes them. By name. With the correct clinical implication carried into the note.
Suicide and homicide risk assessments are not free text. They are structured into ideation, intent, plan, means, protective factors, and disposition, in the shape a chart review or audit reads.
F33.1 not F33. F31.81 not F31. The diagnosis arrives at the level of specificity the payer actually pays. Severity, recurrence, and specifier captured every time.
Pre-visit screeners, AI-scribe consent, prior auth, education letters, superbills. Sent to the patient, surfaced for the clinician, attached to the chart.
Sent by text or email before the session. Returns to the chart by the time the visit starts.
Drafted from the note. Editable. Always reviewed by the clinician before send.
Before a note ships, JotAudit checks it against the published documentation rules of every major payer that pays behavioral health. Missing time. Missing risk language. Missing MDM elements. Missing specifier. Caught before signoff, not in a clawback.
90833 add-on present, but no psychotherapy time documented distinct from the E/M.
Therapy sessions are the most sensitive class of clinical data that exists. The posture below is the standard for every JotPsych customer, not the enterprise tier and not a paid add-on.
Infrastructure: AES-256 at rest · TLS 1.2+ in transit · US-East hosted · SOC 2 certified vendors. Read the full posture on /security.
Section order, phrasing, level of detail, what you bold, what you abbreviate. The note memory holds these across sessions. The third note arrives closer to your style than the first. The thirtieth arrives in it.
Paraphrased from public Reddit threads in r/PMHNP and r/Psychiatry. Posted unprompted, by clinicians comparing six or more AI scribes.
JotPsych is my favorite, having tried about six options.
I really enjoy JotPsych. I edit every note and add what I want, but the AI is great. They also provide a transcript so I can revisit and add what I forgot.
It is the best of the ones I have tried.
Whatever code I use, the note will be more than sufficient to support it.
Source threads are public. Handles paraphrased for clinician privacy.
Fourteen days. Every visit type. Every CPT. Every payer rule. No credit card.
BAA standard. Audio destroyed at transcription. Zero model training.